<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Web 2.0 Style designs disturb me</title>
	<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/</link>
	<description>Golden Age Edition</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: web 1.9x</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>web 1.9x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>good point but who ever said the web was about design? it was conceived as a simple way to publicly post information in a timely fashion. the rest is the design nazis who want to think that web "design" is a requirement. give me back my html 1.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point but who ever said the web was about design? it was conceived as a simple way to publicly post information in a timely fashion. the rest is the design nazis who want to think that web &#8220;design&#8221; is a requirement. give me back my html 1.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerrett</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-985</guid>
		<description>And in the late 90's it was 45 degree angles, and then it was random 3d explosion/shapes, and then it was... 


etc, etc. It'll always be something, that's why it's called a trend :)

I don't disagree with you - I'm just sayin', is all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the late 90&#8217;s it was 45 degree angles, and then it was random 3d explosion/shapes, and then it was&#8230; </p>
<p>etc, etc. It&#8217;ll always be something, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s called a trend :)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with you - I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;, is all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphics For Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphics For Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-727</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Graphics For Web Design...&lt;/strong&gt;

Extremely interesting post. A little bit different from my point of view but neverless an interesting opinion....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Graphics For Web Design&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Extremely interesting post. A little bit different from my point of view but neverless an interesting opinion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Oh, by the way, your site looks nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, by the way, your site looks nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Good point. I agree with you! I love the web2.0 style. But there are so many website designs look alike these days, and no originality...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I agree with you! I love the web2.0 style. But there are so many website designs look alike these days, and no originality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onur Oztaskiran</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Onur Oztaskiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Ahhaha Jim, nice catch! Thank you =)

Martin, that's what I'm bubbling about. It was demanded, so was called popular. I even have had a client that specifically asked for a web 2.0ized header for his community website and the exact line was "do some glossy there, and there and you know stylize the site in web 2.0 look".

What good is having someone designed the site if it will look like any other website? Is it going to have the aspect of aesthetics? 

That's what I'm questioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhaha Jim, nice catch! Thank you =)</p>
<p>Martin, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m bubbling about. It was demanded, so was called popular. I even have had a client that specifically asked for a web 2.0ized header for his community website and the exact line was &#8220;do some glossy there, and there and you know stylize the site in web 2.0 look&#8221;.</p>
<p>What good is having someone designed the site if it will look like any other website? Is it going to have the aspect of aesthetics? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m questioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacksonville Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacksonville Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Hi - nice topic. Been seeing more of this on the web lately, the Web 2.0 look debate. I just noticed though... on your form at the bottom of the page... your text inputs are "closer to me, and younger", but the text area is "sharp edged and corporate". :~) Nice though!

Thank you,
Jim Summer
http://tentonweb.com/ 
Jacksonville Web Design TenTonWeb.com
Jacksonville, Florida USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi - nice topic. Been seeing more of this on the web lately, the Web 2.0 look debate. I just noticed though&#8230; on your form at the bottom of the page&#8230; your text inputs are &#8220;closer to me, and younger&#8221;, but the text area is &#8220;sharp edged and corporate&#8221;. :~) Nice though!</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Jim Summer<br />
<a href="http://tentonweb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tentonweb.com/</a><br />
Jacksonville Web Design TenTonWeb.com<br />
Jacksonville, Florida USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Misconception of Web 2.0 Design Styles</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>The Misconception of Web 2.0 Design Styles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>[...] just finished reading the article; How Web 2.0 Style designs disturb me. The article by Onur Oztaskiran gave me this inspiration to write a continuity to it because I once [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just finished reading the article; How Web 2.0 Style designs disturb me. The article by Onur Oztaskiran gave me this inspiration to write a continuity to it because I once [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stanek</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you... Creativity has more or less diminished these days. However, it is not the result of people being less creative. In my opinion, many websites lacks any preliminary analysis so the desiner have to count on his own opinion and taste how should elements on pages look like and also on common trend.
 
I have to work very often only with poor content and no case study, no concept study. If I had some like that before I started designing, the design would be 100% different. I am sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you&#8230; Creativity has more or less diminished these days. However, it is not the result of people being less creative. In my opinion, many websites lacks any preliminary analysis so the desiner have to count on his own opinion and taste how should elements on pages look like and also on common trend.</p>
<p>I have to work very often only with poor content and no case study, no concept study. If I had some like that before I started designing, the design would be 100% different. I am sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onur Oztaskiran</title>
		<link>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Onur Oztaskiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.monofactor.com/theory/how-web-20-style-designs-disturb-me/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Omfg Elliot! Hah! Now that's what I'm talking about! Great over great presentation

Danny,
I'm glad you're with me on this =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omfg Elliot! Hah! Now that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talking about! Great over great presentation</p>
<p>Danny,<br />
I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re with me on this =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
